25篇英语小短文(带题目,翻泽)，写阅读报告。
一、读书报告的内容可包括：
1．本书的概况：作者简介、内容概要；本书在表达、处理等方面的特别之处等；
2．本书的主要观点、意图；
3．本书的精华部分或个人最喜爱的部分；
4．对本书的评价和观感；
5．读后感：（1）书中情节引起的联想
（2）书中内容引起的疑问
（3）本书令你有何提醒、启发及反思
（4）本书引起的思想上的转变
（5）本书令你引发的期望
6．本书读后的收获。
二、读书报告的撰写步骤：
（一）阅读著作；
（二）确立论题：每人根据阅读感受，自由选取一个自己最感兴趣的角度确立一个论题；选择的角度要小，挖掘要深；
（三）收集资料：1、摘记原文：根据论题，摘录原著中的相关内容，制成摘记卡；
2、查阅其他书籍杂志，掌握相关的资料。
（四）报告的内容：选题理由、确立观点、论述观点
（五）注意点：语言的流畅、观点与论述的一致。
三、写读书报告的注意事项
1．读书报告的形式多种多样，没有任何规范。可以写成很抒情的散文，很尖锐的评论，很精辟的分析，很周详的比较……要看书的性质，也要看你感想的性质。
2．读书时要边看边写，不论有什么感想，疑问和见解，都随即把它们写下来。最好准备一本读书札记簿，写在本子上。书看完了，把自己写下来的那些感受浏览一次，就会发现几个重要可以发挥的。把这几个重点列出来，有时间的话，把书有选择地再看一遍，以便你想论述的重点，找寻更多的资料或例证。有需要时，还可以再找其它有关的书籍来补充你的论点。这样，你阅读的收获会丰富得多，你写的读书报告也会有分量得多。
3．对所读著作的赞扬与批评需要有见地，避免公式化的赞美之词用得过多，赞要赞到作品的节骨眼上，最好是这本书独有的、最突出的优点。批评当然比赞扬更难，因为写读书报告的人学养往往逊于作者，要能指出一本书的缺点，而又能言之成理，使人信服，实在并非易事。但不容易并不表示不可以这样做，如果做得到，这篇读书报告会更容易受到欣赏。
4．读书报告可对一本书全面论述，全面的结果很容易流于浮面，样样都谈到了，但只是泛泛之论，倒不如抓住你最有感受、最有心得的几点来谈。因为你谈得集中、深入，自然能给读者比较深刻的印象。
5．好的读书报告应以写报告人自己的意见为主要内容，原文可以作为举例加以引述，但不宜太多。引述其它人对这本书的看法也要适可而止，一、读书报告的内容可包括：
1．本书的概况：作者简介、内容概要；本书在表达、处理等方面的特别之处等；
2．本书的主要观点、意图；
3．本书的精华部分或个人最喜爱的部分；
4．对本书的评价和观感；
5．读后感：（1）书中情节引起的联想
（2）书中内容引起的疑问
（3）本书令你有何提醒、启发及反思
（4）本书引起的思想上的转变
（5）本书令你引发的期望
6．本书读后的收获。
二、读书报告的撰写步骤：
（一）阅读著作；
（二）确立论题：每人根据阅读感受，自由选取一个自己最感兴趣的角度确立一个论题；选择的角度要小，挖掘要深；
（三）收集资料：1、摘记原文：根据论题，摘录原著中的相关内容，制成摘记卡；
2、查阅其他书籍杂志，掌握相关的资料。
（四）报告的内容：选题理由、确立观点、论述观点
（五）注意点：语言的流畅、观点与论述的一致。
三、写读书报告的注意事项
1．读书报告的形式多种多样，没有任何规范。可以写成很抒情的散文，很尖锐的评论，很精辟的分析，很周详的比较……要看书的性质，也要看你感想的性质。
2．读书时要边看边写，不论有什么感想，疑问和见解，都随即把它们写下来。最好准备一本读书札记簿，写在本子上。书看完了，把自己写下来的那些感受浏览一次，就会发现几个重要可以发挥的。把这几个重点列出来，有时间的话，把书有选择地再看一遍，以便你想论述的重点，找寻更多的资料或例证。有需要时，还可以再找其它有关的书籍来补充你的论点。这样，你阅读的收获会丰富得多，你写的读书报告也会有分量得多。
3．对所读著作的赞扬与批评需要有见地，避免公式化的赞美之词用得过多，赞要赞到作品
写篇英语阅读报告，字数多些
《老人与海》阅读报告
Reading Report for "The old man and the sea"
《老人与海》是海明威于1951年在古巴写的一篇中篇小说,于1952年出版.是海明威最著名的作品之一.它围绕一位老年古巴渔夫,与一条巨大的马林鱼在离岸很远的湾流中搏斗而展开故事的讲述.它奠定了海明威在世界文学中的突出地位,这篇小说相继获得了1953年美国普利策奖和1954年诺贝尔文学奖.
"The old man and the sea" is a novella written by Hemingway in Cuba in 1951, was published in 1952. Hemingway is one of the most famous works. It revolves aroundan old Cuban fisherman, and a huge marlin far offshore in the Gulf Stream inwhich the narrator of the story. It established Hemingway's prominent position in world literature, this novel has won the 1953 Pulitzer prize in 1954 and the USANobel prize for literature.
《老人与海》写的是老渔夫圣地亚哥在海上的捕鱼经历:老人制服大马林鱼后,在返航途中又同鲨鱼进行惊险的搏斗.作品中的形象具有很强的象征意蕴,他用大马林鱼象征人生的理想和人类作为生命本身所不可避免的所具有的欲望,用鲨鱼象征无法摆脱的悲剧命运,用大海象征变化无常的人类社会,而狮子则是勇武健壮、仇视邪恶、能创造奇迹的象征,圣地亚哥则是人类中的勇士与强大势力搏斗的“硬汉子”代表,他那捕鱼的不幸遭遇象征人类总是与厄运不断抗争却无论如何都无法试图去改变命运.“一艘船越过世界的尽头,驶向未知的大海,船头上悬挂着一面虽然饱经风雨剥蚀却依旧艳丽无比的旗帜,旗帜上,舞着云龙一般的四个字闪闪发光——超越极限!”作者海明威是这样评价他的作品《老人与海》的.
"The old man and the sea" is written, the old fisherman Santiago at sea fishingexperience: the old uniform marlin, on the return voyage with shark thriller. The figures in her works has symbolic meaning is very strong, he used the big marlinsymbol of the ideal of life and human life as the inevitable with the symbol ofdesire, can not escape the tragic fate of sharks, sea symbol with constantly changing society, while the lion is the symbol of the chivalrous robust, hatred of evil, can create a miracle Santiago is, in human and powerful warriors fight "hard man", his fishing misfortune symbol of human is always with doom constantly struggle but in any case not to try to change the fate of. "A boat across the end of the world, into the unknown sea, the bow hanging on the side, though furrowed by rain and wind erosion is still colorful flags, banners, four words danced Yunlong general sparkling -- beyond the limit!" Author Hemingway commented on his work"the old man and the sea".
英语读书报告
Book Report
I have been reading a book for many days. The books name is CAT AND MOUSE IN A HAUNTED HOUSE. It is telling about Geronimo Stilton who is a newspaper mouse who runs newspaper in New Mouse City—the capital of Mouse island.
On one night of October, he decided to visit his aunt, Sweetfur. But he got lost when he was driving through the Dark Forest because of the foggy. Then his car was out of gas. He thought “I wish I was at home”.
Suddenly there was a lightning in the sky and he saw a big castle. When he walked closer to the front door, he saw two stone cats and a sign that says: To Canny Cat’s castle. The door bell was in one stone cat’s mouth. When Geronimo was deciding to go into the castle, it starts to rain, so he went into the castle……
At last Geronimo’s sister, little nephew Benjamin and his cousin Trap all came and helped him find out all of two little cat. They don’t want others to come into the castle because the castle is their ancestor Canny Cat’s. So they make many tricks.
After reading this story, I think it’s very interesting, and I had a lot of fun. My favorite character is Geronimo’s nephew Benjamin. Because he is very cute and clever, he always observes every detail. He found out the foot prink on the floor and the nail on the wall. In the story it shows Geronimo is a very timid mouse that always scared himself.
I like this story very much, so I’ll still read more this set of book.
英文读书报告
写古埃及的书，给你两篇读后感：
The ancient Egyptians are an enduring source of fascination--mummies and pyramids, curses and rituals have captured our imaginations for generations. We all have a mental picture of ancient Egypt, but is it the right one? How much do we really know about this once great civilization? In this absorbing introduction, Ian Shaw, one of the foremost authorities on Ancient Egypt, describes how our current ideas about Egypt are based not only on the thrilling discoveries made by early Egyptologists but also on fascinating new kinds of evidence produced by modern scientific and linguistic analyses. He also explores the changing influences on our responses to these finds, by examining the impact of Egyptology on various aspects of popular culture such as literature, cinema, opera, and contemporary art. He considers all aspects of ancient Egyptian culture, from tombs and mummies to the discovery of artefacts and the decipherment of hieroglyphs, and from despotic pharaohs to animal-headed gods. From the general reader interested in Ancient Egypt, to students and teachers of ancient history and archaeology, to museum-goers, this Very Short Introduction will not disappoint.
Be careful to buy this book only if you want to learn about Egyptology as an academic discipline, more than about what scholars think really went on in ancient Egypt. This book is a learned and fascinating introduction to the study of ancient Egypt. If you are looking to understand how scholars painstakingly piece together tiny shards of ambiguous and insufficient evidence to construct an understanding of ancient Egypt, this is your book. If you seek a primer the current state of knowledge on life, religion, politics, culture, and society in ancient Egypt, you should probably buy another book. I bought the book out of a desire to learn more about what current scholarly thinking about ancient Egypt in order to open up a window on that fascinating civilization. Instead, I discovered a compelling (if dry) narrative on how Egyptologists work and reach conclusions. This is a really interesting topic in its own right, and, of course, it is fundamental to evaluating what is presented as "what we know" about ancient Egypt in an intelligent fashion. However, you might not want to spend time learning about Egyptology, but instead want to learn about ancient Egypt. If so, this is likely not the book for you right now
The title of this excellent entry in an excellent series should be 'Egyptology', as it is more about the study of ancient Egypt than the history itself. At 190 pages, it is a little longer than many entries in this series, but the final 30 of those pages are References, Timeline and so on, which provide a good springboard for further study.
Pharaonic Egypt was Earth's first great empire and it lasted for 3 millennia. The author examines the way in which that civilization has been perceived, interpreted and mythologized by, among others, Victorians seeking verification of Biblical stories and by modern, popular culture.
Ian Shaw writes well and comes across as an erudite and objective scholar. He has not used this book as an opportunity to put forward any unorthodoxy of his own, and has not been afraid to include many quotations from other Egyptologists. All of this makes the book a perfect introduction to this fascinating subject.
agree with the other reviewers that this book is not so much about Ancient Egypt as it is about Egyptology. I would say it even expects a previous knowledge of the periods and dynasties of Ancient Egypt. In that respect it fails to live up to its title.
As a book about Egyptology it's slightly dry and not very tight. The author seems to be all over the place. After reading this book, I have learned very little of Egyptology as a discipline except for a few theories expounded in the text.
I would not recommend this book. I am interested in reading Egyptian Myth: A very short introduction as a possible better introduction to Egyptian history, myths, and beliefs.
2
I knew absolutely nothing about ancient Egypt and cared less. I was still fascinated by this book and inspired to follow it up.
It starts with the Narmer Palette, an artefact in the Egyptian Museum in Cairo, and uses the decoration on both sides, pictures and hieroglyphs, to explain some of the things we think we know about ancient Egypt and how we think we know them. It's thought the elegantly outlined depression between the serpopards was used for crushing pigment for eyeshadow....serpopards? Leopards with the heads and neck of snakes.
The book goes on to look specifically at how we establish the narrative history of ancient history (or rather, perhaps, speculate about it rather than establish it), the roles of kings, and the issues of identity (the significance of race and gender in particular) and of religion (mummification, the pyramids and so on). Ancient Egypt really was ancient - the Pharaonic period started 5000 years ago and the timeline in the book goes further back than that - and covered a very long period, lasting into the Roman era AD. It's not surprising perhaps that it's very hard to "know" much, and of course, things will have changed quite a lot in the thousands of years covered by the Egyptian era.
In particular the book exposes some of the conflicts between archeologists, who look at what's left of the buildings and artifacts, and those who read and interpret the writing and hieroglyphs found on them. It had never occurred to me that there might be a division like that.
There is an outline of the rise of Egyptology in the nineteenth century, the mistakes made by early investigators which may have destroyed important evidence (and why they made the mistakes), and, finally some discussion of the impact of ancient Egypt on the twentieth century. This short section gives equal space to the Anthony and Cleopatras of Burton and Taylor on the one hand and of Kenneth Williams and Amanda Barrie on the other - this book has its feet on the ground.
There are good illustrations to support the text (full-page photos of both sides of the Narmer Palette, for example, so you see exactly what the author is writing about), a glossary and several pages of further reading and useful websites.
I was really surprised at being drawn in so thoroughly. Fascinating introduction.
另一篇哲学方面的书：
The last great mystery for science, consciousness has become a controversial topic. Consciousness: A Very Short Introduction challenges readers to reconsider key concepts such as personality, free will, and the soul. How can a physical brain create our experience of the world? What creates our identity? Do we really have free will? Could consciousness itself be an illusion? Exciting new developments in brain science are opening up these debates, and the field has now expanded to include biologists, neuroscientists, psychologists, and philosophers. This book clarifies the potentially confusing arguments and clearly describes the major theories, with illustrations and lively cartoons to help explain the experiments. Topics include vision and attention, theories of self, experiments on action and awareness, altered states of consciousness, and the effects of brain damage and drugs. This lively, engaging, and authoritative book provides a clear overview of the subject that combines the perspectives of philosophy, psychology, and neuroscience--and serves as a much-needed launch pad for further exploration of this complicated and unsolved issue.
I have to admit that at first I dismissed this little introduction to consciousness, but then I read the book again. It's a gem. Blackmore makes it all clear right up front what the problem of consciousness is and several ways that consciousness might be defined. She considers whether consciousness is some integral feature of brain processes or something in addition to the physical features of the brain (a position that goes by the clumsy name of "epiphenomenalism"). Next she talks about a last Cartesian seduction in the thinking of some materialists called "the Cartesian theatre", a phrase coined by Daniel Dennett that means that some scientists have embraced the material operation of the brain but still believe that consciousness is something that appears at a place and time in the brain. It as if there is a little theatre in the brain where consciousness is played.
Blackmore next questions the natural or intuitive idea that consciousness is present in a continuous stream: this is a grand illusion and how the brain may create this illusion is investigated. She focuses on visual perceptual consciousness and presents research that questions our natural understanding of what is going on with our brains while we experience the world. There follows a consideration of "the self" (a useful construction, it seems), conscious will, and altered states of consciousness (psychedelic drugs, meditation, and out-of-body experiences). All in all this is a brief, but very clear and stimulating discussion of consciousness. I find it remarkable that so much was packed in a little volume that left me stimulated and grateful instead of exhausted, bored, or confused.
It's just a great place to begin trying to get a grip on what the fuss is and why consciousness is such a curious and marvelous phenomenon.
No one book can cover all there is to say about the burgening field of Consciousness Studies of Consciousness Research, but this book comes as close as any one up-to-date one can; furthermore, it has all the usual physical advantages of Oxford University Press' "Very Short Introduction" titles: small enough to actually fit into a pockes yet so well bound that when carried so the spine will never crack nor pages ever fall out.
Susan Blackmore's experience as a Zen meditator adds depth to the section on altered states of consciousness as well as to her final summary on the future of consciousness and consciousness research.
A minor disappointment was the abscence of any treatment of Artificial Intelligence and the philosophical problems it raises, especially unfortunate since she sha covered that subtopic well and thoroughly in a longer book. Also some cartoon drawings are rudimentary and add little to the text, but on the other hand, some photographic, do-it-yourself demonstrations of how our conciousness differs from what we believe we introspectively know it to be are excellent.
Another positive for any book but especially one suitable as an initial introduction to a topic is an excellent bibliography for further reading.
2
I first encountered Blackmore's work when, after searching long and hard for a scientific explanation of out-of-body experiences, I came across her book Beyond the Body. It was astonishingly well researched and offered a rational, convincing explanation for phenomena that were usually neglected by the scientific community. I became an instant fan and have followed her work ever since. But now, alas, she has aligned herself with the Dawkins/Dennett axis of drivel, and my loyalty to her is badly shaken. In this book (a shorter version of her Consciousness: An Introduction) she follows Dennett by denying the existence of consciousness and then indulging in much speculation about the properties and evolutionary history of this non-existent entity. Consciousness, she maintains, is an 'illusion', which she defines as something that exists but does not have the properties it appears to have. She then proceeds to discuss it as if it does not in fact exist, and slips into calling it a 'delusion', which she apparently regards as a synonymous term. So far, so Dennett. She follows Dawkins by labeling just about everything a 'meme' (as Poe might have said 'All that we see or seem is but a meme within a meme'), unless she happens not to approve of it, in which case it is 'a virus of the mind'. As an example, she indulges in a quite intemperate and completely irrelevant rant against religion, in which Roman Catholicism is described as a parasitic infection. Like Dennett and Dawkins, she leaves no axe unground.
So why do I give the book 5 stars if I disagree with so much of it? Well, I guess you can't keep a good scientist down, and Blackmore is still a great scientist. She brings considerable knowledge and erudition to the subject, presents fair summaries of opposing views, and gives excellent descriptions of odd phenomena like Libet's Delay and the Cutaneous Rabbit. And her style is as readable as ever. I was suspicious when I saw that her son Jolyon had contributed many of the illustrations - it smacked of nepotism - but I have to say his drawings are really charming and add greatly to the text. The other illustrations are useful too - with the possible exception of a photograph of the author opening a fridge door - which isn't always the case with this series. The book ends with a very useful Further Reading list. It's thus an excellent introduction to the subject (although I think John Searle's The Mystery of Consciousness is still the best place to start).
So, I shall keep the faith and continue to read everything Susan Blackmore publishes. I just hope that one day, just as she once abandoned a belief in the paranormal, she sees the light and abandons the axis of drivel.
3Scientists try to approach the function of the human brain just as they approach the functioning of any other organ in our bodies: as a natural feature of the natural world. According to this view, what we call our "mind" is dependent upon the physical brain, making the mind just as natural and material as other biological processes like digestion. Even so, it's difficult to entirely escape the lure of dualism — the view that "mind" is completely separate from and independent of the physical brain. Usually dualism is accompanied by the belief that the mind is basically the soul — an immaterial, eternal "thing" which represents our true selves. This view has been promoted by theistic religions for millennia.
Because research into the nature and functioning of the brain is still in its relatively early stages, there's a lot of open ground and disputed ideas. Scientific researchers are not united behind a single explanation or way of conceptualizing how the brain creates the mind and consciousness. This means that there is a lot to read and digest before you can claim to at least understand where the current research stands — but fortunately there is a good place to start. Susan Blackmore's Consciousness: A Very Short Introduction is part of Oxford University Press "very short introduction" series and, like other volumes, does a great job at explaining even complicated issues in a way that is comprehensible and engaging for even a general audience. Perhaps the most significant problem in the study of human consciousness is whether there is real problem there or not.
Some argue that there are "easy problems" like explaining how processes like perception and memory work, then the "hard problem" of explaining how consciousness itself works. Others argue that there is no "hard problem" because if we can explain all the "easy problems," then we will have explained consciousness (or at least the explanation for consciousness will immediately and obviously follow). The difference can stated as: is consciousness an "extra thing" or "extra ingredient" in our minds, or is any sufficiently advanced mental processing system also necessarily "conscious"?
For many religious theists, this question necessarily turns on the existence of a soul. Machines and robots cannot be "conscious," for example, because they cannot have souls — only God can imbue a living being with a soul and it cannot automatically appear simply because a system becomes complex enough. Even some scientists who don't believe in souls will agree that simply having all the same parts and complexities as a human brain would not lead to consciousness, but many others think that it would. This means that efforts to create a "conscious" machine will have profound implications for the common belief in dualism, souls, and a "mind" that is immaterial, supernatural, and separate from the physical brain.
Like most scientists and researchers, Blackmore rejects the traditional religious explanations for the mind: she rejects dualism, she rejects the existence of a mind or soul that is independent of the brain, and she rejects the idea that the mind is in any way eternal.
Consciousness: A Very Short Introduction, by Susan BlackmoreBlackmore goes further than most, however, and is inclined to believe that even the existence of a coherent, consistent "self" is likely an illusion. Most scientists seem to be trying to hold on to this, and intuitively it is something that seems to be true. There is a significant amount of evidence and logic which suggests otherwise, though — and if it's true that our traditional, intuitive notion of consistent self is wrong, then what does this say about the existence of a soul?
Although Susan Blackmore certainly has her own views, this doesn't interfere with her explanations — readers won't get the feeling that she is only setting up straw men to attack or that she's giving short shrift to views she doesn't accept. She doesn't hide her own perspective, but she also doesn't let it get in the way of giving readers a broad education in where current research stands, what different researchers think, and of course possible problems with it all.
Blackmore doesn't cover everything, of course, nor could she in a short introduction like this. Yet she does cover plenty, and anyone simply looking for an overview of the field will get all they need. If someone would like more detailed information, a good follow-up would be Blackmore's Conversations on Consciousness, where she interviews many leading researchers to ask them what they think and why.
写书评的三大要素是什么
首先，边阅读，边就情节和内容做笔记，记下日后可能阐发的评论。你会惊奇地发现，阅读时手边有一只铅笔，会使理解更为深人。
阅读报刊杂志上的书评也会使你受益良多。许多国家和地区出版物都辟有书评专栏或专页，一般在接近封底处。
不妨花些时间到图书馆浏览最新几期的《书籍分类目录》和《当代文艺评论与批评》，这里发表有大多数著名作家早期作品的书评摘要，由此可获得有价值的参考文献。在此你还可读到那些你没有时间去看的书的简略的情节摘要，这为你写书评提供了很好的背景知识。
你很快会发现，一篇好的书评应包括以下方面：
1．一个生动的开场白：用一两个简短的段落揭示作者的姓名、书名，以及有关作者的简要信息，如过去的作品、曾获得的荣誉。
2．如果是小说，对情节做简要勾勒，如果作品不是小说，写明写作目的和主题。
3．书评作者对此书优缺点的评论。
4．用一个总结性的语句式段落使读者对此书有一个总体印象
调查报告的三大要素是什么
调查报告一般由分前言、主体、结尾三部分。
1．前言。有几种写法：第一种是写明调查的起因或目的、时间和地点、对象或范围、经过与方法，以及人员组成等调查本身的情况，从中引出中心问题或基本结论来；第二种是写明调查对象的历史背景、大致发展经过、现实状况、主要成绩、突出问题等基本情况，进而提出中心问题或主要观点来；第三种是开门见山，直接概括出调查的结果，如肯定做法、指出问题、提示影响、说明中心内容等。前言起到画龙点睛的作用，要精练概括，直切主题。
2．主体。这是调查报告最主要的部分，这部分详述调查研究的基本情况、做法、经验，以及分析调查研究所得材料中得出的各种具体认识、观点和基本结论。
3．结尾。结尾的写法也比较多，可以提出解决问题的方法、对策或下一步改进工作的建议；或总结全文的主要观点，进一步深化主题；或提出问题，引发人们的进一步思考；或展望前景，发出鼓舞和号召。
